- Illumio vs Asimily: 2026 Comparison
Illumio vs Asimily:
2026 Comparison
Reviewed by Asimily Team · Last updated
Asimily publishes this comparison and is one of the two platforms compared. Illumio details reflect Illumio’s public documentation, announcements, and blog posts as of November 2026, linked where cited. Validate any platform in your own environment.
Based on Asimily product documentation, public Illumio documentation, announcements, and blog posts, and discussions with prospects and customers, as of November 2026; compares Asimily with Illumio Segmentation.
Summary
Illumio and Asimily both offer microsegmentation but start from different assets. Illumio segments servers, virtual machines, containers, and cloud workloads through host agents, and draws IoT and OT device data from partners such as Armis and Claroty. Asimily discovers IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT devices itself, ranks risk by exploitability via a proprietary and patented Asimily Att&ck Analysis, and enforces through existing NACs and firewalls.
What You'll Learn
- How each platform builds its inventory, and where each one gets its device data
- How each platform decides which vulnerabilities to act on first, and what Asimily’s ATT&CK Analysis adds
- Where policy is enforced: host agents, switches, NACs, or firewalls
- When Illumio, Asimily, or both fit
Introduction
Segmentation is a stated priority that many programs have not finished. In Cisco’s 2026 Segmentation Report, 79% of respondents called segmentation a priority and only 33% had fully implemented it (<a href=”https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/hypershield/segmentation-report-2026.html” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>Cisco</a>). Illumio and Asimily approach the gap from different assets. Illumio starts from workloads that run its agent, and for devices that cannot, it brings in data from partners such as Armis and Claroty, ingests firewall flow logs, and offers a gateway-hosted agent. Asimily starts from its own inventory of every connected asset, ties risk to exploitability, and enforces through the NACs and firewalls already in place.
Illumio at a Glance
- Product: a workload-first microsegmentation platform that enforces through host agents
- Verifiable strength: host-agent segmentation across data centers, cloud, containers, and endpoints, with ACL generation for Cisco Nexus and Arista switches
- Dated fact: VEN on IoT Gateway documented August 29, 2026, extending policy to IoT devices behind supported gateways (Illumio Administration Guide 26.x, New and Enhanced in Segmentation)
1. Inventory and Visibility
Asimily provides a complete, agentless, and non-disruptive inventory across an entire cybersecurity tech stack, functioning as a single source of truth for assets, services, apps, workloads, and middleware. It combines deep packet inspection, AI and ML classification against a library of well over 10,000,000 observed devices and profiles, active querying, flow data, and correlation with over 150 different sources, such as Active Directory, CMDB, NAC, DHCP, vulnerability scanners, Mobile Device Management, EDR, and Threat Intelligence. Active methods suit only devices that tolerate the traffic, so Asimily pairs them with passive collection. Users can expect nearly 100% of their connected assets, such as IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT devices, workloads, services, applications, middleware, and AI chatbots, to be identified with 98% or higher accuracy. Illumio analyzes workload traffic and network flows, including NetFlow, sFlow, and flow logs from FortiGate and Palo Alto Networks firewalls. For devices that cannot run its agent, Illumio relies on other data sources: its integration release notes describe bringing in device data and OT and IoMT flow data from partners, and its August 2026 documentation adds a gateway-hosted agent (“VEN-on-IoT-Gateway“) that classifies IoT device types.
Swipe to compare both platforms →
| Feature | Asimily | Illumio |
|---|---|---|
| Passive and Safe Active Data Collection | Yes; passive collection plus safe active querying, agentless | No; ingests flow logs and partner data instead |
| Network Flow Analysis | Yes; inspects headers, payloads, and network flows | Yes; analyzes workload traffic and network flows |
| Deep Packet Inspection | Yes; understands hundreds of protocols when inspecting packets | No; not a core capability |
| Detailed Classification and Inventory for IoT, OT, and IoMT | Yes; inventories IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT using deep packet inspection and AI techniques | Partial; classifies IoT devices through a gateway agent |
| Normalizes Data Across the IT and Security Ecosystem | Yes; correlates and normalizes data from many sources | Partial; imports flow and device data only from partners |
Illumio column: public Illumio documentation as of November 2026.
2. Exposure Management
An excellent and detailed asset inventory feeds exposure analysis, and both platforms strive to deliver that. Illumio’s Vulnerability Map overlays scanner data on its dependency map, scores exposure by how many workloads can reach a vulnerable port, and recommends segmentation policy that lowers the score. Asimily ranks vulnerabilities by impact and likelihood to get from theoretical risk to true risk for an actual asset with its own configuration and network neighborhood in context. This, aided by Asimily Labs’ ATT&CK Analysis tests whether each vulnerability is in fact exploitable on a specific device in the here and now, so teams work from a shorter list of the riskiest devices. Asimily also recommends mitigations when no vendor patch exists, its risk analysis draws on manufacturer security disclosures and software bills of materials (SBOMs), and Risk Simulator models how a fix or a segmentation change would alter a device’s risk score before anyone acts. Illumio’s public documentation describes segmentation policy as its remediation. Asimily also offers options beyond segmentation, such as patching or configuration changes, which can be quicker for some devices.
Swipe to compare both platforms →
| Feature | Asimily | Illumio |
|---|---|---|
| Vulnerability and Threat Detection, Analysis, and Prioritization | Yes; prioritizes using vulnerability analysis in context, SBOMs, and documentation | Yes; scores exposure from scanner data and reachability |
| ATT&CK Analysis of Exploitability per Vulnerability in the Customer Environment | Yes; Asimily Labs analyzes each vulnerability for exploitability | No; scores reachability, not per-device exploitability |
| Targeted Segmentation Recommendations Based on Attack Vectors, Including Legacy Assets | Yes; risk-based analysis auto-suggests safe segmentation | Yes; recommends policy that lowers exposure scores |
| Targeted Mitigation Recommendations, Including on Legacy Devices | Yes; recommends mitigations per attack vector, including legacy | No; recommends segmentation policy only |
| SBOM Incorporation in Vulnerability Analysis | Yes; included in analysis | No; not in public Illumio documentation |
Illumio column: public Illumio documentation as of November 2026.
3. Threat and Response
Both platforms detect anomalous behavior and can contain it. Illumio’s Insights Agent flags anomalies, maps suspicious behavior to MITRE ATT&CK framework, and can quarantine a workload or flow. Asimily’s anomaly policies alert or quarantine devices through NACs and supported firewalls when a policy is violated. Users can set specific rules as needed, and custom rules need no coding. For incident response, Asimily can record packets from any monitored device, on demand or when a policy is violated, so responders start with the traffic itself and not only an alert. Illumio’s Insights Agent works from flow data, and Illumio’s public documentation does not describe packet capture.
Swipe to compare both platforms →
| Feature | Asimily | Illumio |
|---|---|---|
| Anomaly Policies for Notification or Quarantine | Yes; alerts or quarantines when a policy is violated | Yes; Insights Agent flags anomalies and quarantines workloads |
| MITRE ATT&CK Mapping | Yes; MITRE terms used to describe risks | Yes; MITRE terms used to describe risks |
| Multiple Threat Sources Used for Threat Detection and Analysis | Yes; deep algorithmic and human ATT&CK exploitability analysis | Partial; maps suspicious behavior to MITRE ATT&CK |
| Packet Capture From Any Device for Incident Response | Yes; optional full packet capture for any monitored asset | No; Insights analyzes flow data instead |
Illumio column: public Illumio documentation as of November 2026.
4. Risk Mitigation
Illumio enforces mainly through a host agent that programs each workload’s native firewall, and through network enforcement where an agent can’t run. Its Network Enforcement Node generates switch ACLs, and for Check Point customers, its Check Point integration writes firewall rules. Its FortiGate and Palo Alto Networks integrations ingest firewall logs for visibility, and its integration release notes list no NAC integration. Illumio’s policy guide states that unmanaged workloads, including those managed through Network Enforcement Nodes, cannot use selective enforcement. Asimily’s Segmentation Orchestration creates conflict-free policies from observed device behavior, simulates them against live traffic with Policy Simulation, and lets administrators review and adjust each step in an Enforcement Plan before commit, rather than asking users to hope that it all works out. Asimily then applies policy through existing NACs and firewalls, so enforcement lands on existing switch infrastructure via the commands pushed down from the NAC or firewall. Continuous Segmentation applies policy to new devices that match, to get the most out of customers’ existing NAC and firewall investment. Asimily also provides IoT Patching and password management for supported IoT device types.
Swipe to compare both platforms →
| Feature | Asimily | Illumio |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Asset Grouping | Yes; devices can be grouped in ad-hoc combinations | Yes; groups with application and role labels |
| AI-Based Automatic Grouping and Policy Creation | Yes; groups devices and generates segmentation ACLs | Yes; Policy Advisor automates policy creation |
| Simulate Segmentation Policy Effects Before Enforcement | Yes; simulates policy against live traffic first | Yes; previews what a policy would block |
| Switch-Level Enforcement | No; enforces through NACs and firewalls instead | Yes; generates Cisco Nexus and Arista switch ACLs |
| Harnesses Investment in Existing NACs and Firewalls | Yes; applies policy through supported NACs and firewalls | No; integrates firewalls, not NACs |
| IoT Device Patching at Scale, With Auditability | Yes; manually or automatically patches supported IoT devices | No; not in public Illumio documentation |
Illumio column: public Illumio documentation as of November 2026.
5. Governance, Risk, and Compliance
Asimily’s Configuration Control captures configuration snapshots of IoT, OT, and IoMT devices to establish a known good state, detects configuration drift, and gives teams a reference for recovery after an accidental or malicious change. Public Illumio documentation does not describe device configuration snapshots. Ask each vendor how audit records and policy change history reach auditors.
Swipe to compare both platforms →
| Feature | Asimily | Illumio |
|---|---|---|
| Role-Based Access Control & Audit Logs Support | Yes; RBAC and audit logging support | Yes; RBAC and audit logging support |
| Device Snapshots for Configuration Control and Recovery | Yes; captures known good state for IoT, OT, IoMT to detect changes and aid recovery. | No; not in public Illumio documentation |
Illumio column: public Illumio documentation as of November 2026.
6. Sample Integrations
Both platforms integrate across the security stack. Illumio’s integration documentation lists Check Point, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike, ServiceNow, Splunk, Armis, and Claroty, among others. Asimily correlates network, identity, vulnerability, endpoint, and service management data into one record per device, so ATT&CK Analysis of vulnerabilities works best with the fullest context, and applies policy through supported NACs and firewalls. Key integration categories and sample products include:
- AI & LLM Providers: Google Gemini, Anthropic Claude, others
- Network Traffic Sources: NetFlow, SNMP, sFlow
- Identity & Access Management (IAM): Active Directory/LDAP, Azure SSO, Okta
- DHCP & DNS: Infoblox, BlueCat, EfficientIP
- Network Access Control (NAC): Cisco ISE, Aruba ClearPass, Forescout
- Firewalls & Network Infrastructure: FortiGate, Arista Agni, Juniper
- Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR): CrowdStrike, SentinelOne
- CMMS / ITSM: ServiceNow Service Graph, EQ2
Not a complete list; integrations are added regularly.
7. Deployment Considerations
Asimily collects data from network traffic and integrations through the Asimily Edge collector software, which runs on a dedicated appliance, on a virtual machine, or as an app on supported Cisco switches that support application hosting, and it does not install software on monitored devices. Asimily offers cloud and on-premises deployment, including for air-gapped and internet-restricted networks. Illumio’s policy engine is delivered as SaaS or on premises, and a host agent enforces on each managed workload; devices that cannot host an agent are modeled as unmanaged workloads, handled through a Network Enforcement Node or a gateway-hosted agent.
Swipe to compare both platforms →
| Deployment Factor | Asimily | Illumio |
|---|---|---|
| Host-based or Network-based | Network; suitable for all devices | Host, with network add-ons |
| Agents Required on Monitored Devices | Not required | Host agent on managed workloads |
| Deployment Model | Cloud-based or on-premises | SaaS or on-premises |
| Enforcement Path | Existing NACs and firewalls | Host agent, switch ACLs, firewall rules |
When Illumio Fits Better
Illumio is the closer fit when the main goal is segmenting servers, virtual machines, containers, and cloud workloads: general-purpose systems that can run an agent, rather than specialized IoT, OT, or IoMT devices. Illumio’s August 2026 announcement says Forrester named it a Leader in The Forrester Wave: Microsegmentation Solutions, Q3 2026, a vendor-reported result that credits its range of supported workloads. Illumio also generates ACLs for Cisco Nexus and Arista switches, a switch-level path Asimily does not provide because Asimily enforces through existing NACs and firewalls. For IoT devices behind AWS IoT Greengrass or Azure IoT Edge gateways, Illumio’s gateway guide describes label-based policy through a gateway-hosted agent. Many teams could run both: agent-based segmentation for workloads from Illumio, and agentless inventory, exposure analysis, and segmentation for devices from Asimily.
Forrester does not endorse any company, product, brand, or service included in its research publications.
The Bottom Line
Illumio: Illumio is a workload-first microsegmentation platform and an excellent host-based option. It enforces label-based policy through host agents across data centers, cloud, containers, and endpoints, generates ACLs for Cisco Nexus and Arista switches, and extends policy to IoT devices through a gateway-hosted agent, drawing IoT and OT device data from partners such as Armis and Claroty. It suits teams whose main task is segmenting workloads that can run an agent.
Asimily: Asimily treats microsegmentation as one of many features for asset security. It builds the inventory first, covering IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT devices plus software, services, applications, and middleware, then analyzes exploitability on each device with ATT&CK Analysis, then creates, simulates, and continuously maintains segmentation policy that existing NACs and firewalls enforce. This can result in more intelligent segmentation that understands risk. Apart from discovery and network segmentation, Asimily adds IoT Patching, password management, and Configuration Control.
Swipe to compare both platforms →
| Choose Illumio When | Choose Asimily When |
|---|---|
| You are segmenting servers, virtual machines, containers, or cloud workloads that can run an agent | You are securing devices that cannot run an agent, such as badge readers, PLCs, and infusion pumps |
| You want ACLs generated for Cisco Nexus or Arista top-of-rack switches | You already run a NAC or firewall, such as Cisco ISE, Aruba ClearPass, FortiGate, or Check Point, and want policy applied there |
| You want application and role labels to drive policy across data center and cloud | You want to separate risk from vulnerability severity via an analysis that shows which vulnerabilities are exploitable on which devices |
| Your IoT devices sit behind AWS IoT Greengrass or Azure IoT Edge gateways | You want Policy Simulation and an Enforcement Plan reviewed before any NAC or firewall change |
| You will source IoT and OT device data from a partner such as Armis or Claroty | You want richer visibility and classification natively, along with exposure management, incident response readiness, IoT Patching to close out weaknesses faster, and Configuration Control snapshots to avoid configuration drift |
Request a demo
See how Asimily turns exploitable risk into segmentation policy you can simulate before it deploys, alongside the NAC and firewalls you already run.
Related Resources
Asimily Segmentation Orchestration product page
Read more Segmentation OrchestrationPolicy Simulation feature page
Read more Segmentation OrchestrationNetwork Segmentation FAQ
Read more Network Segmentation FAQ: Building, Deploying, and Maintaining Segmentation PolicyColorTokens vs Asimily: 2026 Comparison
Read more ColorTokens vs Asimily: 2026 ComparisonElisity vs Asimily: 2026 Comparison
Read more Elisity vs Asimily: 2026 ComparisonArmis vs Asimily: 2026 Comparison
Read more Armis vs Asimily: 2026 ComparisonForescout vs Asimily: 2026 Comparison
Read more Forescout vs Asimily: 2026 ComparisonFrequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
The main difference between Illumio and Asimily is what each segments and where it enforces. Illumio starts with workloads and enforces policy through host agents that program each workload’s native firewall. Asimily builds its own detailed inventory of IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT devices that cannot run agents, analyzes exploitability with ATT&CK Analysis, and enforces through existing NACs and firewalls. Asimily functions as a single source of truth for assets, services, apps, workloads, and middleware and normalizes data for over 150 different sources, such as Active Directory, CMDB, NAC, DHCP, vulnerability scanners, Mobile Device Management, EDR, and Threat Intelligence.
Illumio reaches IoT devices through a gateway-hosted agent, not an agent on each device. Its August 2026 documentation describes VEN on IoT Gateway, which classifies device types and applies label-based policy, with devices that cannot run an agent modeled as unmanaged workloads. Illumio also imports device data from partners such as Armis and Claroty. Asimily discovers and classifies IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT devices natively without an agent and enforces through existing NACs and firewalls, so no gateway agent is involved.
Possibly, if devices that cannot run an agent are in scope. Illumio segments workloads that run its host agent, and a February 2026 report on its Armis partnership credits Armis with discovering OT and IoT assets. Asimily answers the questions that remain: which devices are being missed, how exploitable they truly are with ATT&CK Analysis, and which policy is safe to apply through your NACs and firewalls. A proof of value shows how many assets remain uncovered.
Asimily segments through the NACs and firewalls already in place, not through host agents. It focuses on IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT devices, and its inventory also covers software, services, applications, and middleware. For workload segmentation enforced by an agent on each server, virtual machine, or container, Illumio is built for that job, which is why many teams pair the two.
No. Asimily applies policy through existing NACs and firewalls, including Cisco ISE, FortiGate, and Check Point, so enforcement lands on existing switch infrastructure via the commands pushed down from the NAC or firewall. Asimily does not program switches itself. Illumio’s Network Enforcement Node generates ACLs for Cisco Nexus 9200 and 9300 and Arista 7000 series switches, which an administrator copies to the switch. Teams that want switch ACLs on top-of-rack data center switches may prefer Illumio for that path.
Yes. Illumio lets teams model policy before enforcement to see what it would block, and its Policy Advisor automates policy creation from network posture insights. Asimily’s Policy Simulation monitors real traffic against a proposed NAC policy without blocking it, and an Enforcement Plan lets administrators review and adjust each step before changes reach the NAC. Both approaches aim to avoid outages during rollout.