Illumio vs Asimily:
2026 Comparison

Teams comparing Illumio and Asimily often have two different problems. One is segmenting servers, virtual machines, containers, and cloud workloads that can run an agent. The other is turning a segmentation goal, perhaps from management or a board, into clear policy for Internet of Things (IoT), operational technology (OT), Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), and IT devices, such as badge readers, PLCs, infusion pumps, and more, that cannot run an agent, without disrupting operations. This page compares the two platforms feature by feature, including where Illumio is the stronger fit.
Request a demo

Reviewed by Asimily Team · Last updated

Asimily publishes this comparison and is one of the two platforms compared. Illumio details reflect Illumio’s public documentation, announcements, and blog posts as of November 2026, linked where cited. Validate any platform in your own environment.

Based on Asimily product documentation, public Illumio documentation, announcements, and blog posts, and discussions with prospects and customers, as of November 2026; compares Asimily with Illumio Segmentation.

Summary

Illumio and Asimily both offer microsegmentation but start from different assets. Illumio segments servers, virtual machines, containers, and cloud workloads through host agents, and draws IoT and OT device data from partners such as Armis and Claroty. Asimily discovers IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT devices itself, ranks risk by exploitability via a proprietary and patented Asimily Att&ck Analysis, and enforces through existing NACs and firewalls.

What You'll Learn

  • How each platform builds its inventory, and where each one gets its device data
  • How each platform decides which vulnerabilities to act on first, and what Asimily’s ATT&CK Analysis adds
  • Where policy is enforced: host agents, switches, NACs, or firewalls
  • When Illumio, Asimily, or both fit

Introduction

Segmentation is a stated priority that many programs have not finished. In Cisco’s 2026 Segmentation Report, 79% of respondents called segmentation a priority and only 33% had fully implemented it (<a href=”https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/hypershield/segmentation-report-2026.html” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>Cisco</a>). Illumio and Asimily approach the gap from different assets. Illumio starts from workloads that run its agent, and for devices that cannot, it brings in data from partners such as Armis and Claroty, ingests firewall flow logs, and offers a gateway-hosted agent. Asimily starts from its own inventory of every connected asset, ties risk to exploitability, and enforces through the NACs and firewalls already in place.

Illumio at a Glance

  • Product: a workload-first microsegmentation platform that enforces through host agents
  • Verifiable strength: host-agent segmentation across data centers, cloud, containers, and endpoints, with ACL generation for Cisco Nexus and Arista switches
  • Dated fact: VEN on IoT Gateway documented August 29, 2026, extending policy to IoT devices behind supported gateways (Illumio Administration Guide 26.x, New and Enhanced in Segmentation)

1. Inventory and Visibility

Asimily provides a complete, agentless, and non-disruptive inventory across an entire cybersecurity tech stack, functioning as a single source of truth for assets, services, apps, workloads, and middleware. It combines deep packet inspection, AI and ML classification against a library of well over 10,000,000 observed devices and profiles, active querying, flow data, and correlation with over 150 different sources, such as Active Directory, CMDB, NAC, DHCP, vulnerability scanners, Mobile Device Management, EDR, and Threat Intelligence. Active methods suit only devices that tolerate the traffic, so Asimily pairs them with passive collection. Users can expect nearly 100% of their connected assets, such as IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT devices, workloads, services, applications, middleware, and AI chatbots, to be identified with 98% or higher accuracy. Illumio analyzes workload traffic and network flows, including NetFlow, sFlow, and flow logs from FortiGate and Palo Alto Networks firewalls. For devices that cannot run its agent, Illumio relies on other data sources: its integration release notes describe bringing in device data and OT and IoMT flow data from partners, and its August 2026 documentation adds a gateway-hosted agent (“VEN-on-IoT-Gateway“) that classifies IoT device types.

Swipe to compare both platforms →

FeatureAsimilyIllumio
Passive and Safe Active Data CollectionYes; passive collection plus safe active querying, agentlessNo; ingests flow logs and partner data instead
Network Flow AnalysisYes; inspects headers, payloads, and network flowsYes; analyzes workload traffic and network flows
Deep Packet InspectionYes; understands hundreds of protocols when inspecting packetsNo; not a core capability
Detailed Classification and Inventory for IoT, OT, and IoMTYes; inventories IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT using deep packet inspection and AI techniquesPartial; classifies IoT devices through a gateway agent
Normalizes Data Across the IT and Security EcosystemYes; correlates and normalizes data from many sourcesPartial; imports flow and device data only from partners
Inventory and Visibility

Illumio column: public Illumio documentation as of November 2026.

2. Exposure Management

An excellent and detailed asset inventory feeds exposure analysis, and both platforms strive to deliver that. Illumio’s Vulnerability Map overlays scanner data on its dependency map, scores exposure by how many workloads can reach a vulnerable port, and recommends segmentation policy that lowers the score. Asimily ranks vulnerabilities by impact and likelihood to get from theoretical risk to true risk for an actual asset with its own configuration and network neighborhood in context. This, aided by Asimily Labs’ ATT&CK Analysis tests whether each vulnerability is in fact exploitable on a specific device in the here and now, so teams work from a shorter list of the riskiest devices. Asimily also recommends mitigations when no vendor patch exists, its risk analysis draws on manufacturer security disclosures and software bills of materials (SBOMs), and Risk Simulator models how a fix or a segmentation change would alter a device’s risk score before anyone acts. Illumio’s public documentation describes segmentation policy as its remediation. Asimily also offers options beyond segmentation, such as patching or configuration changes, which can be quicker for some devices.

Swipe to compare both platforms →

FeatureAsimilyIllumio
Vulnerability and Threat Detection, Analysis, and PrioritizationYes; prioritizes using vulnerability analysis in context, SBOMs, and documentationYes; scores exposure from scanner data and reachability
ATT&CK Analysis of Exploitability per Vulnerability in the Customer EnvironmentYes; Asimily Labs analyzes each vulnerability for exploitabilityNo; scores reachability, not per-device exploitability
Targeted Segmentation Recommendations Based on Attack Vectors, Including Legacy AssetsYes; risk-based analysis auto-suggests safe segmentationYes; recommends policy that lowers exposure scores
Targeted Mitigation Recommendations, Including on Legacy DevicesYes; recommends mitigations per attack vector, including legacyNo; recommends segmentation policy only
SBOM Incorporation in Vulnerability AnalysisYes; included in analysisNo; not in public Illumio documentation
Exposure Management

Illumio column: public Illumio documentation as of November 2026.

3. Threat and Response

Both platforms detect anomalous behavior and can contain it. Illumio’s Insights Agent flags anomalies, maps suspicious behavior to MITRE ATT&CK framework, and can quarantine a workload or flow. Asimily’s anomaly policies alert or quarantine devices through NACs and supported firewalls when a policy is violated. Users can set specific rules as needed, and custom rules need no coding. For incident response, Asimily can record packets from any monitored device, on demand or when a policy is violated, so responders start with the traffic itself and not only an alert. Illumio’s Insights Agent works from flow data, and Illumio’s public documentation does not describe packet capture.

Swipe to compare both platforms →

FeatureAsimilyIllumio
Anomaly Policies for Notification or QuarantineYes; alerts or quarantines when a policy is violatedYes; Insights Agent flags anomalies and quarantines workloads
MITRE ATT&CK MappingYes; MITRE terms used to describe risksYes; MITRE terms used to describe risks
Multiple Threat Sources Used for Threat Detection and AnalysisYes; deep algorithmic and human ATT&CK exploitability analysisPartial; maps suspicious behavior to MITRE ATT&CK
Packet Capture From Any Device for Incident ResponseYes; optional full packet capture for any monitored assetNo; Insights analyzes flow data instead
Threat and Response

Illumio column: public Illumio documentation as of November 2026.

4. Risk Mitigation

Illumio enforces mainly through a host agent that programs each workload’s native firewall, and through network enforcement where an agent can’t run. Its Network Enforcement Node generates switch ACLs, and for Check Point customers, its Check Point integration writes firewall rules. Its FortiGate and Palo Alto Networks integrations ingest firewall logs for visibility, and its integration release notes list no NAC integration. Illumio’s policy guide states that unmanaged workloads, including those managed through Network Enforcement Nodes, cannot use selective enforcement. Asimily’s Segmentation Orchestration creates conflict-free policies from observed device behavior, simulates them against live traffic with Policy Simulation, and lets administrators review and adjust each step in an Enforcement Plan before commit, rather than asking users to hope that it all works out. Asimily then applies policy through existing NACs and firewalls, so enforcement lands on existing switch infrastructure via the commands pushed down from the NAC or firewall. Continuous Segmentation applies policy to new devices that match, to get the most out of customers’ existing NAC and firewall investment. Asimily also provides IoT Patching and password management for supported IoT device types.

Swipe to compare both platforms →

FeatureAsimilyIllumio
Basic Asset GroupingYes; devices can be grouped in ad-hoc combinationsYes; groups with application and role labels
AI-Based Automatic Grouping and Policy CreationYes; groups devices and generates segmentation ACLsYes; Policy Advisor automates policy creation
Simulate Segmentation Policy Effects Before EnforcementYes; simulates policy against live traffic firstYes; previews what a policy would block
Switch-Level EnforcementNo; enforces through NACs and firewalls insteadYes; generates Cisco Nexus and Arista switch ACLs
Harnesses Investment in Existing NACs and FirewallsYes; applies policy through supported NACs and firewallsNo; integrates firewalls, not NACs
IoT Device Patching at Scale, With AuditabilityYes; manually or automatically patches supported IoT devicesNo; not in public Illumio documentation
Risk Mitigation

Illumio column: public Illumio documentation as of November 2026.

5. Governance, Risk, and Compliance

Asimily’s Configuration Control captures configuration snapshots of IoT, OT, and IoMT devices to establish a known good state, detects configuration drift, and gives teams a reference for recovery after an accidental or malicious change. Public Illumio documentation does not describe device configuration snapshots. Ask each vendor how audit records and policy change history reach auditors.

Swipe to compare both platforms →

FeatureAsimilyIllumio
Role-Based Access Control & Audit Logs SupportYes; RBAC and audit logging supportYes; RBAC and audit logging support
Device Snapshots for Configuration Control and RecoveryYes; captures known good state for IoT, OT, IoMT to detect changes and aid recovery.No; not in public Illumio documentation
Governance, Risk, and Compliance

Illumio column: public Illumio documentation as of November 2026.

6. Sample Integrations

Both platforms integrate across the security stack. Illumio’s integration documentation lists Check Point, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike, ServiceNow, Splunk, Armis, and Claroty, among others. Asimily correlates network, identity, vulnerability, endpoint, and service management data into one record per device, so ATT&CK Analysis of vulnerabilities works best with the fullest context, and applies policy through supported NACs and firewalls. Key integration categories and sample products include:

  • AI & LLM Providers: Google Gemini, Anthropic Claude, others
  • Network Traffic Sources: NetFlow, SNMP, sFlow
  • Identity & Access Management (IAM): Active Directory/LDAP, Azure SSO, Okta
  • DHCP & DNS: Infoblox, BlueCat, EfficientIP
  • Network Access Control (NAC): Cisco ISE, Aruba ClearPass, Forescout
  • Firewalls & Network Infrastructure: FortiGate, Arista Agni, Juniper
  • Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR): CrowdStrike, SentinelOne
  • CMMS / ITSM: ServiceNow Service Graph, EQ2

Not a complete list; integrations are added regularly.

7. Deployment Considerations

Asimily collects data from network traffic and integrations through the Asimily Edge collector software, which runs on a dedicated appliance, on a virtual machine, or as an app on supported Cisco switches that support application hosting, and it does not install software on monitored devices. Asimily offers cloud and on-premises deployment, including for air-gapped and internet-restricted networks. Illumio’s policy engine is delivered as SaaS or on premises, and a host agent enforces on each managed workload; devices that cannot host an agent are modeled as unmanaged workloads, handled through a Network Enforcement Node or a gateway-hosted agent.

Swipe to compare both platforms →

Deployment FactorAsimilyIllumio
Host-based or Network-basedNetwork; suitable for all devicesHost, with network add-ons
Agents Required on Monitored DevicesNot requiredHost agent on managed workloads
Deployment ModelCloud-based or on-premisesSaaS or on-premises
Enforcement PathExisting NACs and firewallsHost agent, switch ACLs, firewall rules
Deployment Considerations

When Illumio Fits Better

Illumio is the closer fit when the main goal is segmenting servers, virtual machines, containers, and cloud workloads: general-purpose systems that can run an agent, rather than specialized IoT, OT, or IoMT devices. Illumio’s August 2026 announcement says Forrester named it a Leader in The Forrester Wave: Microsegmentation Solutions, Q3 2026, a vendor-reported result that credits its range of supported workloads. Illumio also generates ACLs for Cisco Nexus and Arista switches, a switch-level path Asimily does not provide because Asimily enforces through existing NACs and firewalls. For IoT devices behind AWS IoT Greengrass or Azure IoT Edge gateways, Illumio’s gateway guide describes label-based policy through a gateway-hosted agent. Many teams could run both: agent-based segmentation for workloads from Illumio, and agentless inventory, exposure analysis, and segmentation for devices from Asimily.

Forrester does not endorse any company, product, brand, or service included in its research publications.

The Bottom Line

Illumio: Illumio is a workload-first microsegmentation platform and an excellent host-based option. It enforces label-based policy through host agents across data centers, cloud, containers, and endpoints, generates ACLs for Cisco Nexus and Arista switches, and extends policy to IoT devices through a gateway-hosted agent, drawing IoT and OT device data from partners such as Armis and Claroty. It suits teams whose main task is segmenting workloads that can run an agent.

Asimily: Asimily treats microsegmentation as one of many features for asset security. It builds the inventory first, covering IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT devices plus software, services, applications, and middleware, then analyzes exploitability on each device with ATT&CK Analysis, then creates, simulates, and continuously maintains segmentation policy that existing NACs and firewalls enforce. This can result in more intelligent segmentation that understands risk. Apart from discovery and network segmentation, Asimily adds IoT Patching, password management, and Configuration Control.

Swipe to compare both platforms →

Choose Illumio WhenChoose Asimily When
You are segmenting servers, virtual machines, containers, or cloud workloads that can run an agentYou are securing devices that cannot run an agent, such as badge readers, PLCs, and infusion pumps
You want ACLs generated for Cisco Nexus or Arista top-of-rack switchesYou already run a NAC or firewall, such as Cisco ISE, Aruba ClearPass, FortiGate, or Check Point, and want policy applied there
You want application and role labels to drive policy across data center and cloudYou want to separate risk from vulnerability severity via an analysis that shows which vulnerabilities are exploitable on which devices
Your IoT devices sit behind AWS IoT Greengrass or Azure IoT Edge gatewaysYou want Policy Simulation and an Enforcement Plan reviewed before any NAC or firewall change
You will source IoT and OT device data from a partner such as Armis or ClarotyYou want richer visibility and classification natively, along with exposure management, incident response readiness, IoT Patching to close out weaknesses faster, and Configuration Control snapshots to avoid configuration drift
Choose Illumio or Asimily

Request a demo

See how Asimily turns exploitable risk into segmentation policy you can simulate before it deploys, alongside the NAC and firewalls you already run.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

The main difference between Illumio and Asimily is what each segments and where it enforces. Illumio starts with workloads and enforces policy through host agents that program each workload’s native firewall. Asimily builds its own detailed inventory of IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT devices that cannot run agents, analyzes exploitability with ATT&CK Analysis, and enforces through existing NACs and firewalls. Asimily functions as a single source of truth for assets, services, apps, workloads, and middleware and normalizes data for over 150 different sources, such as Active Directory, CMDB, NAC, DHCP, vulnerability scanners, Mobile Device Management, EDR, and Threat Intelligence.

Illumio reaches IoT devices through a gateway-hosted agent, not an agent on each device. Its August 2026 documentation describes VEN on IoT Gateway, which classifies device types and applies label-based policy, with devices that cannot run an agent modeled as unmanaged workloads. Illumio also imports device data from partners such as Armis and Claroty. Asimily discovers and classifies IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT devices natively without an agent and enforces through existing NACs and firewalls, so no gateway agent is involved.

Possibly, if devices that cannot run an agent are in scope. Illumio segments workloads that run its host agent, and a February 2026 report on its Armis partnership credits Armis with discovering OT and IoT assets. Asimily answers the questions that remain: which devices are being missed, how exploitable they truly are with ATT&CK Analysis, and which policy is safe to apply through your NACs and firewalls. A proof of value shows how many assets remain uncovered.

Asimily segments through the NACs and firewalls already in place, not through host agents. It focuses on IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT devices, and its inventory also covers software, services, applications, and middleware. For workload segmentation enforced by an agent on each server, virtual machine, or container, Illumio is built for that job, which is why many teams pair the two.

No. Asimily applies policy through existing NACs and firewalls, including Cisco ISE, FortiGate, and Check Point, so enforcement lands on existing switch infrastructure via the commands pushed down from the NAC or firewall. Asimily does not program switches itself. Illumio’s Network Enforcement Node generates ACLs for Cisco Nexus 9200 and 9300 and Arista 7000 series switches, which an administrator copies to the switch. Teams that want switch ACLs on top-of-rack data center switches may prefer Illumio for that path.

Yes. Illumio lets teams model policy before enforcement to see what it would block, and its Policy Advisor automates policy creation from network posture insights. Asimily’s Policy Simulation monitors real traffic against a proposed NAC policy without blocking it, and an Enforcement Plan lets administrators review and adjust each step before changes reach the NAC. Both approaches aim to avoid outages during rollout.