Armis vs Asimily:
2026 Comparison

Security teams comparing Armis and Asimily often start from the same need: a complete inventory of connected devices that cannot run agents. The harder question is what happens after discovery: which vulnerabilities are exploitable, who acts on them, and whether risk is reduced by a ticket, a patch, or an enforced policy. This page compares Asimily with the Armis Centrix platform feature by feature, including where Armis is the stronger fit.
Request a demo

Reviewed by Asimily Team · Last updated

Based on Asimily’s internal product comparison and public documentation as of October 2026; compares Asimily with the Armis Centrix platform.

Summary

Armis and Asimily both discover devices passively, inspect packets, prioritize vulnerabilities, apply anomaly policies, and connect to network access control (NAC) systems and firewalls. The key difference is what happens next. Armis Centrix, now part of ServiceNow, assigns remediation through ticketing workflows. Asimily tests exploitability on each device with ATT&CK Analysis, then creates, simulates, and applies segmentation policy. Asimily also adds IoT Patching and device snapshots.

What You'll Learn

  • Where Armis and Asimily are at parity on device discovery and inventory
  • How each platform decides which vulnerabilities to act on first
  • How each platform turns a finding into reduced risk: tickets, patches, or enforced segmentation policy
  • When each platform is the better fit after the ServiceNow acquisition

Introduction

Independent customer research points the same direction. In KLAS Research’s 2026 Healthcare IoT Security report, Asimily scored 96.6 out of 100 on customer experience, ahead of Claroty (92.1), Armis (91.1), and ORDR (89.4). KLAS respondents credited Asimily’s risk intelligence and vulnerability identification and described Armis as a cost-effective option for large-scale IoT visibility (TechTarget, January 2026; KLAS report). KLAS surveyed healthcare organizations only, but the capabilities respondents rated, such as risk intelligence and vulnerability identification. Published in January 2026, the KLAS report is an independent evaluation that rates Asimily and Armis on the same six customer-experience criteria. The sections below compare the two platforms feature by feature.

Armis vs Asimily at a Glance

The rows below summarize where the platforms match and where they differ. Each row repeats a row from the detailed tables that follow.

Swipe to compare both platforms →

FeatureAsimilyArmis
Passive Data CollectionYes; full-featured passive collection and classificationYes; full-featured passive collection and classification
ATT&CK Analysis of Exploitability per Vulnerability in the Customer EnvironmentYes; Asimily Labs analyzes each vulnerability for exploitabilityYes; general exploitability analysis, not per environment
Simulate Risk Changes From Remediation ScenariosYes; Device Risk Simulator models risk score changesNo; identifies high-impact fixes instead
AI-Based Automatic Grouping and Policy CreationYes; groups devices and generates segmentation ACLsNo; automates mitigation via ticketing instead
Simulate Segmentation Policy Effects Before EnforcementYes; simulates policy against live traffic before enforcementNo; automates mitigation via ticketing, not segmentation
Packet Capture From Any Device for Incident ResponseYes; optional full packet capture for any monitored assetNo; does not perform packet capture only DPI
Connects With NACs and FirewallsYes; applies policies and quarantines through NACs and firewallsYes; actions carried out by connected NACs and firewalls
IoT Device Patching at Scale, With AuditabilityYes; manually or automatically patches supported IoT devicesNo; automates mitigation via ticketing, not patching
Device Snapshots for Configuration Control and RecoveryYes; captures known good state for IoT, OT, IoMTNo; no device configuration control feature
Armis vs Asimily at a Glance

1. Inventory and Visibility

Armis and Asimily both offer inventory and visibility: both collect data passively, query IoT devices actively, inspect packet headers and payloads, and build detailed inventories of Internet of Things (IoT), operational technology (OT), and Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) assets. Active querying suits only devices that tolerate the traffic, so both platforms pair it with passive collection. Both also enrich device records through integrations; Asimily’s include Active Directory, Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) servers, network access control (NAC) systems, vulnerability scanners, and mobile device management (MDM) tools, and it acts through NACs and firewalls.

Swipe to compare both platforms →

FeatureAsimilyArmis
Passive Data CollectionYes; full-featured passive collection and classificationYes; full-featured passive collection and classification
IoT/ OT/ IoMT Device DetailHighMedium
Active Querying of DevicesYes; uses vendor-approved APIs to query if desiredYes; safe active querying alongside passive collection
AI-Based Device ClassificationYes; relies on AI analysis to fingerprint devicesNone known.
Deep Packet Inspection of Headers and Payloads, Plus Network Flow AnalysisYes; inspects headers, payloads, and network flowsYes; inspects headers, payloads, and network flows
Detailed Classification and Inventory for IoT, OT, and IoMTYes; detailed inventory across IoT, OT, and IoMTYes; detailed inventory across IoT, OT, and IoMT
Integrations Across the IT and Security EcosystemYes; correlates and normalizes data from numerous partnersYes; large catalog pulls asset and vulnerability data
Inventory and Visibility

2. Exposure Management

Armis and Asimily both detect and prioritize vulnerabilities and classify them with MITRE ATT&CK; they differ in how far each goes in testing exploitability in the customer environment. Armis describes VIPR Pro, its prioritization and remediation module, as weighing asset context, business risk, threat intelligence, and likelihood of exploit, and as grouping findings that share a fix. Asimily’s ATT&CK Analysis uses MITRE classification and goes beyond it to determine whether a vulnerability is actually exploitable on a specific device in a specific environment, then turns the result into mitigation recommendations that also cover legacy devices. Asimily’s Risk Simulator models how a fix would change a device’s risk score before anyone acts, a step Armis Centrix does not include.

Swipe to compare both platforms →

FeatureAsimilyArmis
Vulnerability and Threat Detection, Analysis, and PrioritizationYes; prioritizes using vulnerability analysis in context, SBOMs, and documentationYes; weighs asset context and likelihood of exploit
Basic MITRE-Based Classification of VulnerabilitiesYes; classifies vulnerabilities using MITRE ATT&CKYes; classifies vulnerabilities using MITRE ATT&CK
ATT&CK Analysis of Exploitability per Vulnerability in the Customer EnvironmentYes; Asimily Labs analyzes each vulnerability for exploitabilityYes; general exploitability analysis, not per environment
Targeted Mitigation Recommendations, Including on Legacy DevicesYes; recommends mitigations per attack vector, including legacyNo
Simulate Risk Changes From Remediation ScenariosYes; Device Risk Simulator models risk score changesNo; identifies high-impact fixes instead
Exposure Management

3. Threat and Response

Armis and Asimily both create anomaly policies that notify or quarantine and connect to NACs and firewalls for response actions; the clearest difference is packet capture. Asimily captures traffic from any monitored device, and a violated policy can start a capture automatically, so incident responders begin with the traffic itself rather than only an alert. Asimily alert rules can also be built on any parameter without code. Detection helps only when a team can act on an alert and reconstruct what happened.

Swipe to compare both platforms →

FeatureAsimilyArmis
Anomaly Policies for Notification or QuarantineYes; alerts or quarantines when a policy is violatedYes; baselines normal behavior and pinpoints anomalies
Alert Rules on Any Parameter Without CodingYes; full flexibility, no coding requiredNo
Advanced Alert Rule Creation Through a WizardYes; builds advanced alert rules through a wizardNo
Packet Capture From Any Device for Incident ResponseYes; optional full packet capture for any monitored assetNo
Connects With NACs and FirewallsYes; applies policies and quarantines through NACs and firewallsYes; actions carried out by connected NACs and firewalls
Threat and Response

4. Risk Mitigation

Armis and Asimily both group assets and offer segmentation guidance; they differ most in whether segmentation policy is created, simulated, and maintained inside the platform. Armis acts on findings through workflow: Armis says VIPR Pro assigns remediation owners with AI, syncs tasks with ticketing systems in both directions, and groups findings into remediation campaigns. Asimily’s Segmentation Orchestration creates policies automatically, targets them at the attack vectors found on each device, simulates them against live traffic with Policy Simulation, and previews the enforcement plan before commit. Continuous Segmentation then automatically applies NAC and firewall policies to new devices that match a policy’s criteria. Asimily also provides IoT Patching and password management for supported IoT device types, which Armis Centrix does not include.

Swipe to compare both platforms →

FeatureAsimilyArmis
Segmentation GuidanceYes; recommends services for SGACL and DACL policiesYes; guidance only, enforcement via third parties
Basic Asset GroupingYes; devices can be grouped in combinations and ACLs generatedYes; devices can be grouped
AI-Based Automatic Grouping and Policy CreationYes; groups devices and generates segmentation ACLsNo; manual grouping only.
Targeted Segmentation Recommendations Based on Attack Vectors, Including Legacy AssetsYes; risk-based analysis auto-suggests safe segmentationNo; grouping does not change in response to changes in risks
Simulate Segmentation Policy Effects Before EnforcementYes; simulates policy against live traffic before enforcement for a user-specified period of timeNo; automates mitigation via ticketing, not segmentation
Preview the Enforcement Plan Before CommitYes; Enforcement Plan lets admins inspect and adjust prior to NAC enforcementNo; enforcement is left to third-party tools
Policy View of Every Policy Applied at NAC and FirewallYes; lists NAC and firewall policies per deviceNo; policy management handled in third-party tools
Policy CompressionYes; with Advanced NAC AuditNo.
Continually Adapt Policies Based on Device Security IntentYes; continuous mode deploys safe policies as conditions changeYes; manually
Deep Integration Across Existing NACs and FirewallsYes; pushes generated ACLs to supported NACs and firewallsYes; connects, but mitigation runs in third-party tools
IoT Device Patching at Scale, With AuditabilityYes; manually or automatically patches supported IoT devicesNo; automates mitigation via ticketing, not patching
Centralized IoT Password ManagementYes; holds IoT passwords for safe patch deploymentNo.
Risk Mitigation

5. Governance, Risk, and Compliance

Asimily Configuration Control captures device configuration snapshots and tracks changes against them; Armis Centrix does not include configuration snapshots. Snapshots of IoT, OT, and IoMT device configurations establish a known good state, which gives teams a reference point for audits and for recovery after an accidental or malicious change. Asimily also keeps a change history for each device. Armis describes VIPR Pro as tracking remediation task status and exception requests for executive reporting.

Swipe to compare both platforms →

FeatureAsimilyArmis
Detailed Change History for Audits and Device ManagementYes; Change Audit logs each parameter change and userPartial; logs present throughout product
Automated Detection of Configuration ChangesYes; regularly checks for any change, authorized or unauthorizedNo, though Armis has additional threat detection offerings
Device Snapshots for Configuration Control and RecoveryYes; captures known good state for IoT, OT, IoMTNo, though network traffic may sometimes reveal configuration changes
Track Configuration Changes Against SnapshotsYes; drift alerts and a change timelineNo
Governance, Risk, and Compliance

6. Sample Integrations

Armis and Asimily both integrate across IT and security tools. Armis offers a large integration catalog, and ServiceNow, which acquired Armis in April 2026, has said it will connect Armis asset intelligence to its workflows; Armis says VIPR Pro ingests findings from scanners and other security tools. Asimily correlates network, identity, vulnerability, endpoint, and service management data into one record per device, integrates with ServiceNow Service Graph, and can apply policies through supported NACs and firewalls. Asimily integration categories and sample products include:

  • AI: any LLM Provider
  • CMMS/CMDB: ServiceNow Service Graph, Ivanti, i-doit
  • DHCP: Infoblox, BlueCat, EfficientIP
  • Endpoint Configuration Management: Microsoft Configuration Manager
  • Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR): CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender, Sentinel One
  • Identity & Access Management (IAM): Active Directory / LDAP, Azure SSO, SAML
  • ITSM: ServiceNow ITSM, Jira, BMC Helix
  • Location Services: Cisco Spaces, Aruba AirWave
  • Mobile Device Management: Microsoft Intune, Jamf Pro, Jamf Cloud
  • Network Access Control (NAC): Cisco ISE, Aruba ClearPass, Palo Alto Panorama
  • Network Segmentation: Color Tokens
  • Network Traffic Sources: NetFlow, sFlow, SNMP Walk
  • SIEM: Elastic SIEM, CrowdStrike LogScale, Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR
  • Threat Intelligence: Cisco XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon X
  • Vulnerability Management (VM): Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7

(Not a complete list; integrations are added regularly.)

7. Deployment Considerations

Armis and Asimily both avoid re-IP work and both offer software as a service (SaaS) and on-premises deployment; Armis offers on-premises in limited cases. On-premises deployment matters for air-gapped and internet-restricted networks, which many OT environments use. Asimily collects data agentlessly through the Asimily Edge collector software, which runs on a dedicated appliance, on a virtual machine, or as an app on switches that support Cisco application hosting.

Swipe to compare both platforms →

Deployment FactorAsimilyArmis
SaaS DeploymentYes; cloud-based SaaS deploymentYes; Armis’s main delivery model
On-Premises DeploymentYesYes; in limited cases
Agents RequiredNoneNone
EnvironmentCloud, On-premisesCloud, On-premises
Data CollectionSub-1U, 1U, Virtual Collectors1U devices, Virtual Containers
Deployment Considerations

When Armis Fits Better

Armis is the closer fit for organizations standardized on ServiceNow: ServiceNow completed its acquisition of Armis on April 20, 2026 (Verdict), and has said it will look to connect Armis asset intelligence to its risk, remediation, and reporting workflows. Armis also suits teams that want one prioritization and remediation workflow across connected devices, cloud, code, and application security findings, which Armis says VIPR Pro is built to consolidate. US federal buyers who must have cloud deployments may weigh Armis’s Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) authorization. In KLAS Research’s 2026 healthcare IoT security interviews, Armis customers also cited its cost-effectiveness for large-scale IoT visibility (TechTarget).

The Bottom Line

While both platforms provide foundational passive discovery, packet inspection, and vulnerability identification, direct customer evaluations show clear distinctions in performance, scope, and operational outcome:

Asset Discovery & Profile Depth: Head-to-head proof-of-concept (POC) comparisons demonstrate that Asimily discovers a higher percentage of total devices and populates richer profile data per asset. Operating agentlessly across the entire cybersecurity stack, Asimily acts as a single source of truth for assets, applications, workloads, and middleware. By combining deep packet inspection, AI/ML classification trained on over 10 million device profiles, safe active querying, and 150+ ecosystem integrations (including Active Directory, CMDB, EDR, and MDM), Asimily identifies nearly 100% of connected IoT, OT, IoMT, IT, and AI assets with 98%+ accuracy.

Workflow vs. Active Remediation: Armis (now part of ServiceNow) focuses on consolidating connected device findings into unified IT prioritization and ticketing workflows. Asimily drives direct risk reduction by tying findings to environmental exploitability and continuous enforcement. Powered by Asimily Labs, ATT&CK Analysis isolates exploitable vulnerabilities per device, Risk Simulator models remediation outcomes, and Segmentation Orchestration generates, simulates, and enforces zero-trust policies. Asimily further extends risk mitigation with automated IoT Patching, centralized password management, and Configuration Control snapshots for IoT, OT, and IoMT devices.

Swipe to compare both platforms →

Choose Armis WhenChoose Asimily When
You want connected device findings integrated into ServiceNow and IT ticketing workflowsYou want each action tied to exploitability and carried through to enforcement (supporting ServiceNow & other ticketing systems)
You want a single prioritization and ticketing workflow across IT, cloud, and application security findingsYou need ATT&CK Analysis of exploitability per device, Risk Simulator modeling, and Segmentation Orchestration (creation, simulation, and enforcement)
You focus primarily on workflow-driven remediation and ticketingYou want IoT Patching with password management, plus Configuration Control snapshots for IoT, OT, and IoMT devices
Choose Armis or Asimily

Request a demo

See how Asimily turns exploitable risk into segmentation policy you can simulate before it deploys.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

The main difference between Armis and Asimily is how each acts on a vulnerability. Armis Centrix prioritizes findings and assigns remediation through ticketing and workflow tools. Asimily analyzes exploitability with ATT&CK Analysis and offers several fixes: tickets, segmentation policy it simulates before enforcement, IoT Patching for supported devices, and configuration snapshots. Both discover devices passively and connect to NACs and firewalls.

Yes. ServiceNow completed its acquisition of Armis on April 20, 2026, for about $7.75 billion (Verdict; Yahoo Finance). ServiceNow has said it will connect Armis asset intelligence to its risk, remediation, and reporting workflows. Armis continues to sell the Armis Centrix platform, and its 2026 materials are signed “Armis from ServiceNow.”

Armis Centrix is the Armis cyber exposure management platform. Its 2026 materials name modules including Armis Centrix for Asset Management and Security, Vulnerability Management Detection and Response, Application Security, VIPR Pro for prioritization and remediation, and Early Warning. Armis positions the platform as covering IT, OT, IoT, medical devices, critical infrastructure, cloud, and code. Armis has been part of ServiceNow since April 2026 (Verdict).

Armis Centrix for VIPR Pro is the Armis module for vulnerability prioritization and remediation. Armis describes it as aggregating findings from scanners, endpoint, cloud, code, and application security tools, grouping findings that share a fix, assigning remediation owners with AI, and syncing tasks with ticketing systems in both directions. Asimily covers the same prioritization step for connected devices with ATT&CK Analysis and Risk Simulator.

Asimily integrates with ServiceNow, including ServiceNow Service Graph, so teams that run ServiceNow can sync Asimily’s device inventory to their configuration management database and create tickets for remediation tasks, such as high-severity vulnerabilities. Choosing Asimily for connected device security does not require leaving ServiceNow workflows behind. Asimily also integrates with Jira and other IT service management tools.

Armis Centrix provides segmentation guidance only and connects to NACs and firewalls, which can enforce policy; it does not simulate segmentation policy or preview enforcement, according to Asimily’s October 2026 comparison. Asimily’s Segmentation Orchestration creates policies targeted at each device’s attack vectors, simulates them against live traffic, and applies them through supported NACs and firewalls, with Continuous Segmentation covering new matching devices.

Armis and Asimily both prioritize vulnerabilities and classify them with MITRE ATT&CK, but they test exploitability differently. Armis weighs business risk and likelihood of exploit, and this comparison rates its exploitability analysis as general rather than specific to each environment. Asimily’s ATT&CK Analysis determines whether each vulnerability is exploitable on a specific device in a specific environment, and Risk Simulator models the effect of a fix before anyone acts.

Armis Centrix does not include IoT device patching or IoT password management, as of October 2026; Armis assigns remediation tasks to owners through workflow integrations. Asimily can also provide IoT Patching, which applies firmware updates to supported IoT device types manually or automatically, at scale, with an audit trail, plus centralized password management. For devices that cannot be patched, Asimily recommends targeted mitigations and segmentation.

Armis Centrix does not include packet capture from any device, according to Asimily’s October 2026 comparison. Asimily captures raw traffic in packet capture (PCAP) format from monitored devices, on demand or automatically when an anomaly policy is violated, and tracks every capture in one forensic view. Incident responders get the traffic itself, not only an alert, when they investigate an anomaly.

Armis is delivered mainly as software as a service (SaaS) and offers on-premises deployment in limited cases. Asimily offers both cloud and on-premises deployment, including for air-gapped and internet-restricted networks, and collects data through the Asimily Edge collector software on a dedicated appliance, a virtual machine, or switches that support Cisco application hosting.

For healthcare, independent customer research favors Asimily. In KLAS Research’s 2026 Healthcare IoT Security report, Asimily scored 96.6 out of 100 on customer experience and Armis scored 91.1 (TechTarget, January 2026). KLAS respondents valued Asimily’s risk intelligence and vulnerability identification and saw Armis as cost-effective for large-scale IoT visibility. Both platforms cover IoMT devices.

Asimily is not only for healthcare: it secures IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT assets for organizations in healthcare, manufacturing, utilities, government, and critical infrastructure. Configuration Control, for example, captures snapshots for IoT, OT, and IoMT devices alike. On Gartner Peer Insights, Asimily holds a 4.9 out of 5 rating from 55 reviews as of October 2026.

Common alternatives to Armis include Asimily, Claroty, Dragos, Forescout, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks, ORDR, and Tenable, as compared in our Armis alternatives guide. Asimily differs from Armis by carrying a finding through to a fix: ATT&CK Analysis identifies which vulnerabilities are exploitable, Segmentation Orchestration creates and simulates the policy, and Asimily can offer IoT Patching.

Sources