- Claroty (Medigate) vs Asimily: 2026 Comparison
Claroty (Medigate) vs Asimily:
2026 Comparison
Last updated
At a glance
Claroty and Asimily both provide agentless visibility, vulnerability management, and threat detection for IoT, OT, and medical devices. The key difference is what happens after risk is found: Claroty xDome recommends broad segmentation and enforces it through partner firewalls and NACs, while Asimily generates attack-vector-based policies, maintains them continuously, and adds native IoT patching, password management, and configuration-drift control.
What You'll Learn
- How Claroty and Asimily differ in platform scope and device coverage.
- How each platform evaluates and prioritizes exploitable risk.
- Where segmentation policy is created, simulated, applied, and continuously maintained.
- Which platform best fits specific operational and infrastructure requirements.
Introduction
Claroty and Asimily both provide agentless visibility, vulnerability management, and threat detection for IoT, OT, and medical devices. The key difference is what happens after risk is found: Claroty xDome recommends segmentation and enforces it through partner firewalls and NACs, while Asimily generates attack-vector-based policies, maintains them continuously, and adds native IoT patching, password management, and configuration-drift control.
1. Inventory and Visibility
Complete visibility forms the core baseline of connected asset security. While passive network scanning provides basic traffic baselines, Asimily expands coverage through deep packet inspection, AI and ML classification against a library of well over 10,000,000 observed devices and profiles, active querying, flow data, and correlation with over 150 different sources (such as Active Directory, CMDB, NAC, DHCP, vulnerability scanners, Mobile Device Management, Threat Intelligence, EDR, and others). Asimily discovers what runs on assets, not just the assets themselves, including services, applications, middleware, and AI chatbots. Claroty relies on correlating outside sources and analyzing network traffic to assist with identification. The table below compares how Asimily and Claroty handle inventory discovery, asset data collection, device classification, and CMMS/CMDB reconciliation.
Swipe to compare both platforms →
| Feature | Asimily | Claroty |
|---|---|---|
| Passive Data Collection & Comprehensive Deep Packet Inspection | Yes; full-featured | Yes; full-featured |
| Outside Data Source Ingestion | Yes; numerous integration partners | Yes; numerous integration partners |
| Time to Initial Inventory | 2–14 Days | 2–14 Days |
| Peer Traffic Flows & Topology Mapping | Yes; ingests flows and adds monitoring to provide mapping | Yes; ingests flows and adds monitoring to provide mapping |
| AI-Based Device Classification | Yes; relies on AI analysis to fingerprint devices | No; relies on past database to fingerprint devices |
| API-Based (Safe Active) Scanning | Yes; uses vendor-approved APIs to query if desired | No; relies on passive methods and integrations only |
| CMMS and CMDB Inventory Reconciliation | Yes; correlates and normalizes data sources | Yes; correlates and normalizes data sources |
| Customizable Device Data Retention | Yes; customers can alter the time period for which device data is retained | Partial; customers can select between specific offered retention times |
2. Exposure Management
Identifying vulnerabilities is only the first step; security teams require contextual risk intelligence to prioritize remediation. Asimily eliminates theoretical alert noise by directly calculating true exploitability based on live network topology, active device configurations, and ATT&CK threat analysis from Asimily Labs, avoiding reliance on generic severity scores. Claroty evaluates risk primarily through external threat databases and baseline criticality rankings. The comparison table below highlights key differences between Asimily and Claroty across vulnerability sourcing, exploit analysis, and risk simulation capabilities.
Swipe to compare both platforms →
| Feature | Asimily | Claroty |
|---|---|---|
| NVD and Manufacturer Vulnerability Sourcing | Yes; ingests multiple sources to rapidly find new vulnerabilities | Yes; ingests multiple sources to rapidly find new vulnerabilities |
| Passive Vulnerability Assessment | Yes; does safe analysis of vulnerability to determine exploitability using patented techniques | Yes; uses rubrics to assess actual risk from a vulnerability |
| ATT&CK Vector Analysis for Specific Customer Environment | Yes; Asimily Labs explicitly analyzes each customer vulnerability for exploitability | No; relies on vulnerability severity and risk rubrics |
| Incorporate Manufacturer Security Disclosures into Risk Analysis | Yes; Disclosures are included in the risk analysis | No; Disclosures are made available for reading |
| Incorporation of SBOMs into Vulnerability Analysis | Yes; included in analysis | Yes; included in analysis |
| Risk Reduction Action Simulation | Yes; to determine effort compared to benefit for any proposed action | No |
| Vulnerability Prioritization Based on Many Sources | Yes; uses all attack frameworks and vulnerability data available, including specific documentation, SBOMs, and more for vulnerability prioritization | Partial; uses a smaller set of sources for vulnerability prioritization |
3. Threat Detection
Rapid threat detection prevents lateral movement across critical subnets. Asimily combines deep packet-level forensics and customizable alert parameters mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK matrix to isolate emerging risks. Claroty offers signature-based and anomaly alerts with a MITRE ATT&CK matrix view. See the table below for a side-by-side feature comparison between Asimily and Claroty for threat detection, signature mapping, and automated packet capture.
Swipe to compare both platforms →
| Feature | Asimily | Claroty |
|---|---|---|
| Simple Anomaly Detection & IoC Management | Yes; seeks universal anomalies, changes, and known IoC | Yes; seeks universal anomalies, changes, and known IoC |
| External Malicious Communication Alerts | Yes; detected through network traffic monitoring | Yes; detected through network traffic monitoring |
| MITRE ATT&CK Matrix View & Mapping | Yes; maps potential exploits to MITRE ATT&CK framework | Yes; maps potential exploits to MITRE ATT&CK framework |
| MITRE ATT&CK used for threat detection and analysis | Yes; algorithmically and human analysis uses MITRE ATT&CK to determine exploitability | No |
| Alert Customization on Any Parameter | Yes; full flexibility | No; pre-set options |
| Automated/Manual Packet Capture with Audit Trail | Yes; optional full packet capture for any monitored asset | No |
4. Risk Mitigation
Effective risk mitigation requires automated, verifiable enforcement. Asimily natively orchestrates full-lifecycle segmentation—delivering continuous microsegmentation, live NAC policy simulation, automated configuration drift detection, and targeted IoT patching without external dependencies. In contrast, Claroty provides segmentation guidance that depends on third-party tools to create and execute policies. Below is a detailed comparison of both platforms across risk mitigation and network enforcement.
Swipe to compare both platforms →
| Feature | Asimily | Claroty |
|---|---|---|
| Macro Segmentation Applied to Firewalls/NACs | Yes; devices can be grouped manually and ACLs generated | Yes; devices can be grouped manually and ACLs generated |
| Targeted Segmentation Based on Attack Vectors | Yes; risk-based analysis auto-suggests safe segmentation | No |
| NAC Policy Simulation Against Live Traffic | Yes; can use live traffic to simulate policy efficacy prior to NAC enforcement | No |
| Continuous Segmentation | Yes; can run in continuous mode to assess and deploy safe policies based on current conditions | No |
| NAC Policy Auditing | Yes; can determine if policies are effective given limited switching and memory resources | No |
| IoT Device Patching | Yes; can manually or automatically push patches in a common way to diverse IoT devices | No |
| IoT Password Management | Yes; can hold IoT passwords for purposes of safe deployment of patches | No |
| Device Snapshots and Automated Configuration Drift Detection | Yes; can take device configuration details at a known good point in time and regularly check for any change – authorized or unauthorized | No |
| Native Integration Across Major NAC Platforms (Cisco ISE, Aruba, Extreme, Arista) | Yes | Partial |
5. Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC)
Enterprise governance requires standardized risk benchmarking and procurement safeguards. Asimily provides role-based access controls, organization risk scoring, pre-procurement risk modeling, out-of-the-box hardening guidance, and customizable reporting engines to maintain compliance from asset acquisition through retirement. Claroty supports standard role-based access controls and organizational risk scoring. The matrix below outlines how Asimily and Claroty compare across governance, risk modeling, pre-procurement analysis, and compliance reporting.
Swipe to compare both platforms →
| Feature | Asimily | Claroty |
|---|---|---|
| Role-Based Access Control & Audit Logs | Yes; multiple roles and logging throughout platform | Yes; multiple roles and logging throughout platform |
| Organizational Risk Score Benchmarking (Across IoT, OT, and IoMT) | Yes; breakout by device type and time frame | Yes |
| Automated Actions Assignment | Yes | Yes |
| Custom Reporting Engine on Any Platform Attribute | Yes | Yes |
| Pre-Procurement Risk Modeling (Buy/Configure Safest Known IoMT Devices) | Yes; full data on IoMT devices and safe configurations | No |
| Out-of-the-Box Device Hardening Recommendations Pre-Deployment (for IoMT) | Yes; full data on safe configurations, based on prior safe deployments | No |
6. Sample Integrations
Ecosystem connectivity determines how efficiently an asset visibility platform integrates into security operations. Rather than just offering a set of piecemeal connectors, Asimily acts as a unified single source of truth across your entire security and IT stack. It ingests, normalizes, and correlates complex device-level and network-level data into a central intelligence model. By serving as the authoritative data foundation, Asimily ensures all connected systems receive consistent, enriched asset intelligence. Claroty provides a Swagger-based API Explorer and select EDR/firewall connectors for internal teams to complete setup and data normalization. Asimily provides over 100 native, configured integrations that unify data streams across your preferred stack, maintaining a synchronized single source of truth. Intelligence from experience with specific products’ data, their accuracy and trustworthiness, and their mapping to a single asset detailed view are part of the integration process for any Asimily integration partner. Key integration categories and sample products include:
- AI & LLM Providers: Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini
- Network Traffic Sources: NetFlow, SNMP, sFlow
- Identity & Access Management (IAM): Active Directory/LDAP, Azure SSO, Okta
- DHCP & DNS: Infoblox, BlueCat, EfficientIP
- Network Access Control (NAC): Cisco ISE, Aruba ClearPass, Forescout
- Firewalls & Network Infrastructure: FortiGate, Arista Agni, Juniper
- Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR): CrowdStrike, SentinelOne
- CMMS / ITSM: ServiceNow Service Graph, EQ2
(not a complete list; new integrations added regularly)
7. Deployment Considerations
When assessing agentless deployments, infrastructure requirements matter. Below is a comparison table summarizing the key deployment factors, collection options, and host requirements for Asimily and Claroty.
They have similar options to run in dedicated hardware, in virtual containers, on switches’ memory plus Asimily can also run in small Sub-1U boxes to provide a different level of affordability to physically distributed deployments.
Swipe to compare both platforms →
| Deployment Factor | Asimily | Claroty |
|---|---|---|
| Agents Required | None | None |
| Environment | Cloud, On-premises | Cloud, On-premises |
| Data Collection | Sub-1U, 1U, Virtual Collectors | 1U devices, Virtual Containers |
The Bottom Line
Claroty and Asimily both provide agentless visibility, exposure assessment, and threat detection across connected device environments. Choosing between them depends on whether an organization requires an industrial OT remote access focus or native end-to-end risk mitigation and segmentation orchestration.
Claroty (including xDome and CTD) serves enterprises heavily focused on industrial operational technology (OT) discovery, secure remote access, and macro-segmentation policy recommendations. It fits organizations where network segmentation rules are primarily translated and enforced through external partner firewalls and NAC infrastructure.
Asimily is built for security and IT teams seeking to move directly from asset discovery to automated, continuous risk reduction across all assets, services, apps, and middleware. Using proprietary ATT&CK Vector Analysis, Asimily identifies exploitable attack paths on real network topologies to prioritize the highest-risk vulnerabilities. The platform natively bridges intelligence and action by orchestrating microsegmentation policies for major NACs, simulating rules against live traffic prior to deployment, pushing IoT patches and password controls, and continuously auditing policy drift.
Request a demo
See how Asimily takes your riskiest devices from identified to contained, with every policy simulated before it deploys.
Related Resources
Segmentation Orchestration
Read more Segmentation OrchestrationPolicy Simulation
Read more Solutions – Network Segmentation and MicrosegmentationNetwork Segmentation FAQ
Read more Network Segmentation FAQ: Building, Deploying, and Maintaining Segmentation PolicyArmis Alternatives: 2026 Guide
Read more Best Armis Alternatives: 2026 GuideFrequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Claroty is a cyber-physical systems protection platform prioritizing industrial OT visibility, threat detection, and remote access. Asimily focuses on feature depth and breadth beyond inventory generation and vulnerability management to provide proactive defense across IoT, OT, IoMT, and IT. Asimily is built to progress security teams from initial visibility straight to continuously maintained, enforced segmentation policy across over 100 integrated platforms.
Claroty xDome generates macro-segmentation policies without simulation and relies on partner firewalls and Network Access Control (NAC) systems to enforce them. In contrast, Asimily natively generates attack-vector-based microsegmentation policies, simulates policy impact against live network traffic prior to deployment, and continuously updates and audits enforcement rules to prevent configuration drift.
No. Asimily secures IoT, OT, and IT assets across finance, critical infrastructure, manufacturing, and defense. Among others, Asimily won the 2026 Merit Awards in the general Operational Technology and Industrial IoT Security category. It also ranks highly in Gartner (Peer Insights) and KLAS.
Neither platform requires endpoint agents. Both platforms discover and classify devices without installing endpoint software, protecting legacy infrastructure, OT, and medical devices where agents are unsupported. However, deploying Claroty Edge via Docker requires your team to manage and secure the underlying container infrastructure. Asimily has a range of options from pure software (in containers or as switch applications) to powerful hardware appliances for collection to meet any size and budget.
Claroty groups vulnerabilities using Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) and Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) data alongside general asset criticality scores. Asimily utilizes proprietary ATT&CK Vector Analysis to simulate exploit paths on specific device configurations in your environment. This provides an actionable remediation list ranked by real-world likelihood of exploitation rather than broad vulnerability scores.
Asimily has earned top industry accolades, including the 2026 Merit Award for Operational Technology and Industrial IoT Security. The platform is highly rated across Gartner Peer Insights and KLAS Research for healthcare and enterprise IoT security deployment, compliance management, and ease of integration.
While Claroty xDome for Healthcare (formerly Medigate) and Continuous Threat Detection (CTD) offer healthcare and industrial CPS discovery, top alternatives include Asimily, Armis, and Ordr. Asimily differentiates itself by natively combining IoMT/IoT visibility with automated risk prioritization, continuous microsegmentation, and direct IoT device patching without requiring complex third-party tools.
No. Claroty xDome identifies vulnerabilities and offers mitigation recommendations, but relies on third-party patch management platforms or manual IT/biomed workflows to execute updates. Asimily natively provides automated and manual IoT device patching at scale along with centralized password management and audit logging.